Statute, Limitations, Legal Malpractice
The statute of limitations for legal malpractice lawsuits varies from state to state. Usually, the time
allowed to initiate a suit is between one to four years, depending upon the requirements of each
jurisdiction. Many states also provide a discovery rule, which prevents the commencement of the time period
until a client either knew, or should have known, that legal malpractice was committed. For malpractice to
actionable in court, personal injury laws generally require proof of negligence. Alternatively, state bar
grievance procedures are accepted on a case by case basis and may require lawyers to return client funds
without the necessity of proving negligence through expert opinions or testimony.
Personal Injury Law - Statute, Limitations, Legal Malpractice:
When evaluating any legal malpractice claim, state personal injury law usually determines particular causes of
action that give rise to civil responsibility, what damages may be recoverable, and how a monetary award of
the court may be collected. Less often, federal preemption of state laws requires lawsuits to be initiated in the
federal court system or various administrative proceedings, or optionally, may allow a selection of either
federal or state tribunals. In all cases, settlement of civil liability claims before trial is preferred by the
judiciary as a matter of public policy. For plaintiffs, settlement of legal malpractice claims is optional,
and may provide several benefits over trial. These benefits include the reduction of risk, a known amount collected,
and decreased time, attorney fees, and litigation costs required to receive and collect judgments. The single greatest
disadvantage of settling a legal malpractice claim is financial - plaintiffs may receive significantly larger verdicts
when courts or a juries determine the amount of judgments.
Interpretation of Laws:
The analysis of facts and applicable personal injury laws is a fluid process, based upon circumstances
that are individual to each lawsuit. Statutes,
case law, and rules of court all impact success or failure. Lawyers who specialize in
legal malpractice claims for plaintiffs tend to interpret laws broadly in favor of clients pertaining to liability,
damages, procedural requirements, and many other legal issues. Similarly, defense lawyers and insurance adjusters
are equally effective influencing settlement amounts in legal malpractice claims for far less than the actual trial value when potential
plaintiffs represents themselves. See also: Statute, Limitations, Legal Malpractice - How to Find a Lawyer, Laws, &
Lawyer Searches.
|