Personal Injury Cases - Lawyers & Law Firm Recoveries For Plaintiffs
The circumstances which give rise to civil liability in personal injury cases are as varied as the
injuries themselves. Common law, case law, statutes, and ordinances may all create meritorious causes of
action. The common thread connecting all negligence cases is the failure of the defendant to act reasonably
in a given circumstance. Negligence - a violation of law - unreasonable conduct - recklessness - wanton disregard -
all these forms of substandard behavior create liability. Nevertheless, each plaintiff must still prove a causal relationship between prohibited conduct,
resulting harm, and the amount of damages sought. All issues are subject to dispute.
The Standard Of Negligence In Personal Injury Cases
The standard of negligence in personal injury cases is an organic concept. To become actionable,
negligent conduct must ordinarily fall below the standard of care used by a reasonably prudent person in the
same or similar circumstance. In practice, the ordinary care required by this mythical person is determined
based on common life experiences shared by members of a jury. In almost all circumstances, jurors sincerely
strive to reach a just conclusion. Nevertheless, to evaluate negligence properly, familiarity with
local community values is essential to determine "ordinary" and "reasonable" under the law.
Judges instruct juries on the law. These written instruction include a definition of negligence, assign a burden of
proof to the plaintiff, and require a particular level of certainty to find in favor of a plaintiff. Jurors
are usually instructed to draw conclusions from "a preponderance of the evidence" in civil cases, which is
akin to a "more likely than not" decision. Stated similarly, the evidence must show that the negligence of
all included defendants was at least 51% likely to have caused the accident.
See also: managing personal injury cases and Law Firms for increased plaintiff recoveries - client legal issues.
|
